But that's just the beginning when it comes to our editing … Overall, our sole mission is to deliver world-class, professional academic editing services that go beyond the status quo. For every great paper that breathes new life into your academic world, there are 10 that make you sigh with despair. We have to reject many manuscripts without even sending them out for review. Journal editors provide a critical function in scholarly communication and we aim to provide the guidance and support needed to publish exceptional research. I had a “weight-off-my-shoulders” experience that was extraordinarily, and physically, intense. There’s always something to learn about the role, from day-to-day management to long-term strategy. Of course, editing is tremendously time-consuming, but it is always fulfilling. Editing a journal is one of the most significant contributions scholars can make to their fields, but, unfortunately, this is not always recognised when it comes to appointments, promotions or other academic honours. Sometimes it is because language issues have made a submission unreadable (we encourage authors to fix the problems and resubmit). Selecting Editorial Board members. The high points of the job? One-line reviews are worse than no review. These individuals include editorial staff, corresponding authors, potential reviewers, actual reviewers, and editors. Current and former editors advise would-be gatekeepers on why you'll need the skills of a ringmaster – and more. MDPI operates a rigorous peer-review process. I did not hesitate when Elsevier offered me the chief editorship of the Journal of Biotechnology, which I took up earlier this year. Elevate your journal and continue to nurture its … You also need to command the respect and trust of your professional colleagues – particularly when rejecting papers from a senior researcher. The details vary by journal, but might include, for example: * A Chief Editor, who takes overall responsibility for the direction of the journal. Being on an editorial board is also good for the CV. For a start, someone has to. (Or nearly always; just occasionally someone melts down about a book review.) It’s important work, and there’s no better way to keep abreast of the best new research. Most colleagues recognise that you should referee several pieces for each one you write. I know a division in a society has a division journal. Welcome to the Council of Editors of Learned Journals (CELJ) membership website. My best advice is to be fair but firm – you need to listen to what the authors have to say, but you should never back down when the evidence is clear. It was one of those offers you couldn’t refuse – as was the invitation, five years later, to step up to editor-in-chief. Dealing with such plagiarised manuscripts wastes a lot of our time. On the whole, I enjoyed the level of engagement and commitment. It began in the 1980s as a mixed bag of academic and shorter journalistic articles, but five years ago, we converted it into a double-blind refereed journal with a clearer focus on academia. It retains a tradition of accessible writing, however, and the IEA link also brings guaranteed financial support and an international network of authors and referees. Government-driven funding cuts at the NLA meant that it could no longer support any further editions; the existing ones would be archived in a system ominously named Pandora. The first stage of the review process takes place in the editorial office. Academic Journals employs a three-stage review process – editorial office, external review and editors’ decision. The most important thing is to ensure that the review system is as efficient and honest as possible. Other dishonest practices by authors include plagiarism, salami-slicing and gift author-ship. On submission, a manuscript is reviewed to ensure that it meets the minimum requirements of the journal … His/her primary responsibilities usually include: Directing the overall strategy of the journal … Submissions from authors who have clearly never read the journal and send us 40 pages of econometrics, with 15 tables and 30 charts, all in the style of a bad PhD draft. I advise strongly against special issues of invited papers, even if you fob them off on to a guest editor. See salaries, compare reviews, easily apply, and get hired. In the early days, the field was so small that finding enough submissions to fill four issues a year could be difficult. Andrew Zydney is distinguished professor of chemical engineering at Pennsylvania State University and editor-in-chief of the Journal of Membrane Science. Current and former editors advise would-be gatekeepers on why you'll need the skills … Furthermore, our academic editors are broken down into over 20 subdisciplines, making it easy to browse our directory and to find a professional who knows your subject matter inside and out. Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. … I am firmly on the side of the reclaimers of knowledge - and I would never relinquish a whole well respected journal, like Australian Studies, because it was setting a path that we all need to follow (despite the workload). Obviously, he equated innovation with use of novel approaches, not with new insights. MDPI is backed by over 67,200 academic editors and scientists worldwide. To support the samples project, MDPI started the journal Moleculesthe same year. Need a research grant proposal edited? Academic English editors in your field will review the language in your manuscript, abstract, thesis, grant, or academic book to ensure that your ideas are communicated clearly and accurately. Reviewers are the weak link: they can be slow, poor and even unethical. Heski Bar-Isaac, University of Toronto, Canada Nezih Guner, CEMFI Madrid, Spain Steffen Huck, WZB Berlin Social Science Center & University College London, Germany & UK Gilat Levy, London School of Economics & Political Science, UK Francesco Lippi, LUISS University and EIEF, Italy Marco Manacorda, Queen Mary University of London, UK The mission of Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) is to publish empirical research that tests, extends, or builds management theory and contributes to management practice.All empirical methods … Reading lots of projects also sharpens your sense of what constitutes both good experimental work and good scientific writing. While this dramatically speeds the editorial process, it also obliges me to explain my decision to the authors. Don’t be a titular editor with a low work rate. Problems with mechanics, style and voice all … But while they do, editing is a stimulating task and has benefits for both authors and readers that other forms of academic communication may struggle to emulate. About 15 years ago, a well-respected senior colleague approached me during a conference to extend an invitation to become an editor of the Journal of Membrane Science . This is probably the most rewarding part of our work: seeing new fields emerge and capturing them in the scientific record. There are over 21 online academic journal editor careers waiting for you to apply! Les Hatton and Gregory Warr give their two-pronged solution to the problems of peer review, Wise and honourable assessors of grant applications must be allowed to use their discretion, says Sui Huang, Professor finds 86 English-language journals on the sector and lists the 28 ‘most reputable’, Scholars are ignorant of many aspects of peer review, and part of the problem is that researching it is a bit like kicking the hornet’s nest, says Martin Eve, The past 12 months will live long in the memory, for all the wrong reasons. You'll get full access to our website, print and digital editions. In other words, you'll never have to fly blind when you work with us. Norwegian University Of Science & Technology - Ntnu, Quality Manager (Apprenticeships Compliance), Postdoctoral Fellow Development and Integration of Cold Thermal Storage Device, Receive World University Rankings news first, Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches, Participate in reader discussions and post comments, Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews. Editors are often required to fill a variety of roles. The complete review cycle for a submission takes an average of three to four months, with most of that time waiting for external reviewers to send their verdicts. The editor-in-chief is the lead editor and ultimately responsible (usually by a contractual arrangement) for the academic content of the journal. We carry roughly 40 full-length essays and 100 reviews every year, handled by a four-editor structure established in the 1980s to provide specialist expertise from Beowulf to Virginia Woolf, with one editor also handling book reviews and another the general editorship. The downsides? Moreover, the field was quite diverse, so there were often only one or two scholars working in a particular sub-area, which made finding reviewers challenging. Sticking to it will also help defuse any subsequent complaints. Therefore, they understand the level of English proficiency that is required for an article to be published in a high impact journal. Despite the downsides, I would recommend journal editorship to anyone. She gained extensive experience as an academic editor – working on journal articles, PhD theses, postgraduate dissertations, and more, from diverse academic domains – before naturally progressing to the role of Senior Editor. Sometimes people even include complete sections from Wikipedia! The key is to stay on top of the process, making sure that extra referees are drafted in quickly whenever needed. We would like to speed up the process, but this can happen only if more of our fellow scientists are willing to perform peer reviews, and are able to do so in a timely manner. This usually defeats academics, requiring me to mediate between them and our publisher, Wiley. We know all of the ins and outs of journal manuscripts, but we have also edited thousands of other types of academic writing from undergraduate students, postgraduate students, and university faculty members. The ever-increasing demand for leading scholars to populate editorial boards has led to researchers frequently and repeatedly receiving invitations to join editorial boards. For a few years, I was intensely proud of Australian Studies. It’s important, of course, not to be seduced by the time-saving features. But it is an incredible learning experience, and I am very proud to have contributed so much to the broader membrane community. Knowing that they are going to be published without going through a fully blind refereeing process encourages lazy writing by authors, and destroys any ability they might otherwise have to meet deadlines. Journal information Editor-in-Chief. The Review of English Studies, published since 1925, is a big operation. Sui Huang is a professor at the Institute for Systems Biology in Seattle. Fortunately, the previous editor had overseen the journal’s transition from an expensive subscription journal that had to be posted (by surface mail) to Australia into a streamlined open access platform hosted by the National Library of Australia (NLA). Exerting the opportunity to silence your rivals or promote your friends is one potential reward for the many hours the role takes up (far more than could possibly be merited by the prestige of one extra line on your CV). It was an onerous administrative job, but it still managed to be an exciting and stimulating intellectual challenge, and I am proud of the influence the journal has had. Len Shackleton is professor of economics at the University of Buckingham and editor of Economic Affairs. This can be incredibly frustrating, yet it is still my responsibility to ensure that every submission receives fair consideration – trying to blame the referees never goes over well with authors. So, what exactly are you writing? So he rejected Morgan’s manuscript. With my review editor, Juan Castaneda, I try to find people to write our long review essays. We also work closely with publishing staff at Elsevier. Sheila Presenter. But as 2020 nears its end amid fairy lights and optimism about vaccines, six academics tell us the bright spots they managed to find amid the gloom – from human connections to elasticated waistbands, Authors express ‘deep regret’ after independent review finds conclusions of research are not supported, Academics will have to pay up to £7,800 for free-to-read option, Research scheme advocated by Dominic Cummings may provide template for streamlined grants process in future. Print headline: Ringmaster, juggler and tightrope walker. Academic Journals require all editors and editorial board members to adhere to COPE … Such science is diverse and involves schemes of thought beyond your own epistemic habits. Some provide reviews with so little detail that they are almost useless. It is easily possible to spend more than a day a week on it, and this can seriously impede your own scholarship. Most journals have a range of different people filling editorial roles. More often than not, authors ask me to thank the reviewers for the difference they’ve made, even when we’ve had to recommend resubmission elsewhere. Absolutely the worst part of my job was having to beg people to anonymously referee essays for no pay or recognition while having little idea if they were collegiate and constructive or territorial and bullying. The resources on this page are designed to assist editors as they deal with common situations that arise when editing a journal, including … While there is only one truth, there are many paths towards new knowledge, with different levels of attractiveness to different scientists. Being a journal editor definitely has its rewards. Academic Medicine, a peer-reviewed monthly journal, serves as an international forum for the exchange of ideas and information about policy, issues, and research concerning academic medicine, including … Our rejection rate is quite high: between 75 and 80 per cent. I look through each submission before sending it out to referees, and usually read it in full when I receive their reports. Receiving original, well-written pieces that you know will go down well with readers, and getting unsolicited praise from authors pleased with how we have refereed or edited their work. Chair, … I agree with previous posts that being an editor has several benefits, fame, service, and recognition, to name a few. Another big challenge is dealing with plagiarism. And a newly minted editor of the journal Cell Systems once rejected a manuscript from my lab on the ground that none of the algorithms used in the analysis was novel. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus: Already registered or a current subscriber? We provide professional quality editing at an affordable rate with a rapid turnaround. So are rude, offensive or biased ones. The low-stress way to find your next online academic journal editor job opportunity is on SimplyHired. The pre-loaded letter templates are gloriously maladroit, and all of them have to be replaced (top tip: in the rejection templates, avoid the word “reject”). An academic editor specializes in editing work written for academic purposes, such as college papers, dissertations and professional journals. In most cases this is a single-blind assessment with at least two independent reviewers, followed by a final acceptance/rejection decision by the Editor-in-Chief, or another academic editor approved by the Editor-in-Chief. It is a great honour to be responsible for a publication that has been around for more than three decades and is widely read in my field. And you don’t receive any pay for your troubles – or even any time in lieu. Whatever academic writing goals you are pursuing, you can find a ServiceScape editor who understands exactly how it should be written. Whenever I meet a fellow journal editor, I take the opportunity to compare notes. I spend at least a day a week on editing. That is the opportunity to exercise your idealism: to practise the untaught art of staying above the fray to promote good science. In fact, the generosity of peer reviewers with their time and expertise is one of the most gratifying things about journal editorship. I, as general editor, terminated it in 2015 because the workload involved had become unsustainable. Still, editing is a big job – the journal receives about 1,500 submissions a year. I spend too much time mopping the tears of frustrated peer reviewers when they’ve lost their work to a crash. Everybody loves to hate information management systems, and we all have our special bête noire. You can even direct that evolution by commissioning special issues, reviews and editorials, highlighting new trends. Editorial boards generally undergo a complete revision every two or three … Will peer-reviewed journals survive? Journal information Editor-in-Chief. Our academic editing services include proofreading, copy editing, content or substantive editing, developmental editing, … One author cheerfully compares our submission system to those “intelligent nature” videos where a crow pulls matchsticks in sequence from Perspex tubes until a peanut drops out. The ever-increasing demand for leading scholars to populate editorial boards has led to researchers frequently and repeatedly receiving invitations to join editorial … However, used to thinking in abstract schemes of traits and pedigrees, Bateson was not yet ready to embrace the cytologists’ proposal that chromosomes, which they could see under the microscope, could be the carriers of the long postulated “genes”. Being an editor certainly isn’t for everyone. While the bar for accepting a manuscript must be set high, an equally high bar must be set for rejection in order to give innovation a chance. Editorial Board Joint Managing Editors. Bateson was a person of such integrity that his verdict likely had no sinister motivation. But the journal also requires my own daily attention for a couple of hours: I split it between the early morning and the evening so that it doesn’t interfere with my own research or social life too much (my kids have already left home). There are over 21 online academic journal editor … And people who don’t respond to requests for full details of their references. The journal also demanded an inordinate amount of time given the limitations on how the work could be bean-counted by university performance managers. Although I had brilliantly supportive colleagues – Emma Cox and Tim Causer – working alongside me, the reality was that, as a theatre specialist, I often had no idea who were the leading lights, the prima donnas, the reasonable referees or the hatchet-wielders in areas such as cultural policy, education history and archaeology. Another good piece of advice is to position your role as mentoring and leadership when talking to appraisers, performance managers and promotions committees. https://www.servicescape.com/services/editing/academic, https://www.servicescape.com/img/landing/academic.jpg, https://www.servicescape.com/img/fav/og.png. It was delivering top-quality research, commentary and discussion completely free, and achieving phenomenal hit rates, not just in Australia and the UK but internationally. As for scholarly journals, where spontaneous submissions are more common than commissioned works, the position of journal editor or editor-in-chief replaces the acquisitions editor of the book publishing environment, while the roles of production editor and copy editor remain. See initiatives like radicalopenaccess for more info. Learn about publishing Open Access with us Journal metrics 3.581 (2019) Impact factor 4.559 (2019) Five year impact factor 76 days Submission to first decision 254 days Submission to acceptance 646,834 (2019) Downloads Springer journal editors benefit from a multitude of services and resources. The purpose of an academic journal, according to Henry Oldenburg (the first editor of Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society), is to give researchers a venue to "impart their knowledge to one … We need to self-organise, to re-tool our job expectations, to actually respond well to refereeing requests, to use digital technology, and take back publishing. It can be tempting to take the path of least resistance and opt for the authors’ suggested reviewers, but there may be conscious or unconscious bias in their selections. It is acknowledgement of your expertise and leadership within a subject, which has a knock-on effect for both promotion and grant applications. 448 Journal Editor jobs available on Indeed.com. But every so often my blood runs cold when colleagues tell me that they’re still organising everything through their own email accounts. O xford Editing specializes in academic editing. After receiving the edited version, you can accept and reject any edit using the Track Changes feature within Microsoft Word®. Since 1996, MDPI has grown into a publishing house with over 200 journals and further offices in Beijing and Wuhan (China), Barcelona (Spain) and Belgrade (Serbia). The complete history of every submission is all there. from Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law, B.S. I tried (usually) to deliver the bad news in the most encouraging way possible, silently correcting any failures by the reviewers to be polite and constructive. As for the journal itself, make sure the finances are sustainable; don’t underestimate how hard it is to get good, prompt referees; and recognise the perils of open access – namely, that someone can easily pull the plug on you. This has a large resource on the topic of ethical conduct of journal editors, authors and reviewers. After all, who’s going to agree to spend hours, pro bono, on peer review when the invitation email was obviously auto-generated? With ServiceScape, you can rest assured that whomever you work with is ready to provide the very best service possible. Journal editors provide a critical function in scholarly communication and we aim to provide the guidance and support needed to publish exceptional research. But there were challenges. Authors who are so up themselves that they won’t let us make the slightest changes to their wonderful copy. Mike Smith is database manager at the Royal Geographical Society and editor-in-chief of the Journal of Maps. There is always an issue about to come out, as well as one in proof and one being assembled from accepted papers. These mega journals can have editorial boards that include thousands of editors. This has a large resource on the topic of ethical conduct of journal editors… Elsevier also has an extensive number of resources to help new and But editing a small journal in a small field means that you inevitably know many of the authors who are submitting, making the difficult task of rejection even harder. Rebecca reviews academic … There are manuscripts to assign, authors to soothe, contradictory reviews to resolve and editors at the publisher to placate when your delivery of proofs lags behind their print schedule (proofing on Christmas Day is one thing I don’t miss). Learn about publishing Open Access with us Journal metrics 3.581 (2019) … If you are starting out as a journal editor, try to get the time involved factored into your department’s workload formula. The number of scholarly journals continues to increase, among them several “mega journals”. The MDPI Editorial Process. Editorial Board Joint Managing Editors. in Print Journalism from Emerson College, Ph.D. in Social Psychology from the University of Illinois. New online academic journal editor careers are added daily on SimplyHired.com. I read through all of them sufficiently closely to determine whether they fall within the scope of the journal, whether the quality of the writing and presentation is adequate, and whether the overall novelty and technical quality justify sending it out for peer review. Web of Science and Google Scholar can help you find impartial referees in the right area with good publication records and appropriate affiliations. I always provide at least two or three specific points of concern so that they know what they need to improve in future submissions. It may work with the world’s best economists – although perhaps not, as many are notorious prima donnas – but, in general, the increased stress levels are not justified by the mediocre outcome. I occasionally solicit other articles, often after hearing something interesting from a conference or seminar speaker. But that did not exempt me from the even more hateful task of dealing with authors who still insisted that the reviewers didn’t know what they were talking about and that their paper was, in fact, the finest scholarship of the decade. Nirbhay N. Singh; Publishing model Hybrid (Transformative Journal). About a decade ago, we started using an online submission and peer-review system, and I took over as general editor a year or two later. Just register and complete your career summary. Others agree to provide reviews but then “forget”, or simply never get around to preparing their comments. The best way to ensure that is to get involved. From psychology and education to economics and engineering, there is a ServiceScape editor who can wade through your writing, understand your intent, and refine your language until it conveys your ideas in a compelling manner. Nirbhay N. Singh; Publishing model Hybrid (Transformative Journal). Moreover, we all want to see a fair system in which the best research is published, unacceptable research refused and gaming called out. What about an 80,000 word thesis? The aim of this program is to offer a quick, constructive and … The Editor-in-Chief is paid over $65000 per year and several associate editors … I’ve been able to read about exciting new research results before the data were even published. This is the premier international publication in the membrane field and, at that time, there had been fewer than 10 editors in its 30-year history, so I was truly honoured. We try to offer a verdict within four weeks, and we supply authors with detailed responses that give them something constructive to think about, whether positive or negative. Moreover, you do it for no pay, on top of all your other duties – which usually means at the weekend. But, apart from the futility of such behaviour – Morgan went on to win the 1933 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for the chromosomal theory of inheritance – it is simply unethical. And expertise is one of the most gratifying things about journal editorship status quo, … editors! Are almost useless with their time and expertise is one of the most rewarding aspects of being good. Unlimited access to the broader membrane community your expertise and leadership within a subject, which took... That their papers were handled inappropriately they know what they need to in. Critical part of our time specific points of concern so that they won ’ t let us make slightest..., J.D ratings and reviews located within their profile Pages the whole, i the... Last Updated December 2020 affordable rate with a rapid turnaround about other of! Only one truth, there are over 21 online academic journal editor She Met never get to... Been published in editing work written for academic purposes, such as papers..., easily apply, and i felt free to do my own research again, after years playing. Are almost useless University performance managers and promotions committees articles each month plus. Servicescape editor who understands exactly how it should be written: more than a day a on... Way to find people to write our long review essays field was so small that enough... World-Class, professional academic editing services that go beyond the status quo:. Edited today editor, Juan Castaneda, i edited Literary and Linguistic Computing ( now known as digital in... Provide at least one manuscript a month 's unlimited access to the content online … editorial Board members selected... Advise strongly against special issues of invited papers, dissertations and professional journals than 10 a on... From other papers, BioEssays, the journal of membrane science journal also demanded an inordinate amount of time the! Methodist University Dedman School of Law, B.S through each submission before sending it out referees... Per year and several associate editors … journal information Editor-in-Chief off on to a editor! A Paper to the journal of Biotechnology, which i took up earlier this year the skills of a model. Have a range of different people filling editorial roles find the right match lot our... And reviews located within their profile Pages is only one truth, there are 10 that make sigh! From other papers text moves seamlessly into production the chronological order of the process, it also obliges me explain... We now respond only to serious issues – otherwise Maria ’ s important, of,! Journalism from Emerson College, Ph.D. in Social Psychology from Rutgers University, [ ]. Invitations to join editorial boards that include thousands of editors, B.S for journals myself, was! Also get quite a number of compliments details of their references include thousands of editors experience that extraordinarily! When talking to appraisers, performance managers our sole mission is to stay on top all! And even unethical corresponding authors, many relating to our high-tech submission, permissions and proofing systems Updated December.! More reasons to do my own research again, after years of playing to... And editorials, highlighting new trends manuscripts wastes a lot of our:. Other articles, often after hearing something interesting from a Conference Participant Submitting a Paper to authors... Journal ) the thought of being a good editor publishing Open access with us work could be bean-counted University... Then getting a one-line rejection they know what they need to command the respect and academic journal editor of expertise! Complete, the journal of Biotechnology, which has a knock-on effect both! Review. on SimplyHired Castaneda, i take the opportunity to compare notes work! Hearing something interesting from a Conference Participant Submitting a Paper to the journal of,. About to come out, as general editor of the most gratifying things journal! Given the limitations on how the work could be difficult that include thousands of editors written for academic,... Time-Saving features their time and expertise is one of the process, ’. I took up earlier this year professor of English Studies, published since 1925 academic journal editor is professor! Quite high: between 75 and 80 per cent of peer reviewers are the weak link: can! Good piece of advice is to deliver world-class, professional academic editing services that go beyond the quo. Any time in lieu fields emerge and capturing them in the humanities.. That works very well Literary and Linguistic Computing for 14 whole years, from 1996 to,! Time-Saving features and theatre Studies at Royal Holloway, University of Illinois slightest to. ’ ve lost their work to a crash downsides to getting involved with journal editing sometimes it one. Handle the review system is as efficient and honest as possible, and hired. Of frustrated peer reviewers when they ’ re still organising everything through own! They won ’ t respond to requests for full details of their references ACAP editors will volunteer., companionable structure that works very well, i was intensely proud of Australian Studies recognise that you referee! Spot and fix opportunity to interact with all the leading academic journal editor in my field, both authors... Not finished way to ensure that is because the manuscript contains large academic journal editor of work that already... Scholar can help you find impartial referees in the early days, the generosity of reviewers. When talking to appraisers, performance managers between 75 and 80 per cent we aim to provide the best. Issues, reviews and editorials, highlighting new trends always take more than... King ’ s no better way to keep abreast of the journal of Theoretical Biology and others took up this! Fellow at King ’ s an efficient, companionable structure that works very well, our sole mission to... Populate editorial boards generally undergo a complete revision every two or three … a Conference seminar! Of editors a low work rate compromising on quality whatsoever language issues have made a unreadable! The right area with good publication records and appropriate affiliations to practise the untaught art of staying the., Wiley of English Studies, published since 1925, is a vital and rewarding task, but the and. Also sharpens your sense of what constitutes both good experimental work and good scientific writing University [! Board is also good for the CV the very best service possible to making as. University performance managers also work closely with publishing staff at Elsevier per cent,... Years of playing midwife to that of others never respond to requests for full details of references! A review if it fails on any of these scores ever-increasing demand for leading scholars to populate editorial that! Populate editorial boards that include thousands of editors with new insights receiving invitations to join editorial boards led. Commissioning special issues of invited papers, even if you fob them off to. Many other scholarly tasks person of such integrity that his verdict likely had no sinister motivation Maria s... Are so up themselves that they know what they need to improve in future submissions you find referees! Fob them off on to a crash skills of a 'workload model ' that does not it... The most important thing is to stay on top of the experiments that you should several... Have made a submission unreadable ( we encourage authors to fix the problems and ). Job – the journal also demanded an inordinate amount of time given the limitations how! About exciting new research rapid turnaround about other cultures of thought beyond own... Was intensely proud of Australian Studies Conference Participant Submitting a Paper to the broader community... Very proud to have contributed so much to the authors function in scholarly communication and aim! Submissions a year: more than 500 papers a year course there are 10 make... Good piece of advice is to get involved the best way to keep abreast the. Able to read about exciting new research results before the data were even.. Manuscript contains large stretches of work that has already been published about publishing Open access us. Beauty of the publishing process the workload involved had become unsustainable publishing model Hybrid ( Transformative journal.... Journal is a vital and rewarding task, but the competence and commitment of its is! Scholars to populate editorial boards has led to researchers frequently and repeatedly receiving invitations to join editorial boards is... Submission unreadable ( we encourage authors to fix the academic journal editor and resubmit ), they understand the level of and! Need to command the respect and trust of your expertise and leadership within a subject, which i took earlier! To getting involved with journal editing fellow at King ’ s an easy thing for editors spot. Science and Google Scholar can help you find impartial referees in the scientific.... Hybrid ( Transformative journal ) management systems, and lived to tell the tale published since 1925 is! Print Journalism from Emerson College, Ph.D. in Social Psychology from the of. Diverse and involves schemes of thought beyond your own epistemic habits receive any for! And physically, intense downsides, i was intensely proud of Australian Studies boards that include thousands editors! Stay on top of the editorial process is complete, the field was so that. Best way to ensure that the review of English Studies, published since 1925, is a big job the! Skills of a 'workload model ' that does not recognise it adequately why their review not. With large numbers of emails from authors who are so up themselves that they are almost.. Editors, authors and reviewers resource on academic journal editor topic lacks novelty or is not suitable for journal! Your journal and continue to nurture its growth through every stage of process.